
You know I'm just fucking with you. It's been a long time since we agreed you're nuts and you'd buy me a beer if we met.

Missing the point. You elected a proud pussy grabber to make YOUR small world better. If it weren’t so disturbing for the country I’d laugh. Pussy Hatsamzie wrote:Pussy hats are worn by women who want free birth control and abortion on demand. Noble political causes?
I hope for your sake that you’re smarter than you lead one to believe. Inequality is inequality. And yes, I absolutely think it is the responsibility of the government in an ostensible democracy to provide some regulation in the way income brackets are taxed, such that those who make the most are taxed the most by percentage, and such that the wealth of the richest 1 percent is more equitably distributed in order to bolster the middle class and help the impoverished emerge from poverty. But hey, maybe it’s my pussy hat. Or maybe it’s your MAGA hat.TinyElvis wrote:You're comparing income inequality to slavery and the Holocaust? You want a government entity to dictate how much each family should make and distribute accordingly? Your pink-pussy hat must be on too tight.
You're comparing income inequality to slavery and the Holocaust? You want a government entity to dictate how much each family should make and distribute accordingly? Your pink-pussy hat must be on too tight.turpentim wrote:I'm certainly not here to debate Jay's annual salary, net worth, etc., but I will say that, by most estimates, one has to make around $400,000/year to be in the top 1 percent. I don't know if he makes that or not, and I don't care. What I do know is that Jay, like many who are *definitely* in the 1 percent, knows right from wrong and understands the devastating consequences of severe income inequality. And "rile up"? Perhaps you mean "voice support for"? "Express outrage on behalf of"?TinyElvis wrote:So Jay is trying to rile up a group that he isn't even a part of? Sounds like a familiar strategy.
Also, yes, it is a familiar strategy. And thank goodness for that. What are you getting at here? I suppose white abolitionists shouldn't have fought for the freedom of slaves because they themselves weren't black or enslaved? And all gentiles should have just looked the other way when Nazis were sending Jews to their deaths? And I suppose all straight people shoudn't care one way or another about the rights of the LGBTQ community? And fuck the homeless; I'm not homeless.
WTF.
Tim in the ATL
Tiny E tryin to rile up a group he ain’t part of?turpentim wrote:I'm certainly not here to debate Jay's annual salary, net worth, etc., but I will say that, by most estimates, one has to make around $400,000/year to be in the top 1 percent. I don't know if he makes that or not, and I don't care. What I do know is that Jay, like many who are *definitely* in the 1 percent, knows right from wrong and understands the devastating consequences of severe income inequality. And "rile up"? Perhaps you mean "voice support for"? "Express outrage on behalf of"?TinyElvis wrote:So Jay is trying to rile up a group that he isn't even a part of? Sounds like a familiar strategy.
Also, yes, it is a familiar strategy. And thank goodness for that. What are you getting at here? I suppose white abolitionists shouldn't have fought for the freedom of slaves because they themselves weren't black or enslaved? And all gentiles should have just looked the other way when Nazis were sending Jews to their deaths? And I suppose all straight people shoudn't care one way or another about the rights of the LGBTQ community? And fuck the homeless; I'm not homeless.
WTF.
Tim in the ATL
I'm certainly not here to debate Jay's annual salary, net worth, etc., but I will say that, by most estimates, one has to make around $400,000/year to be in the top 1 percent. I don't know if he makes that or not, and I don't care. What I do know is that Jay, like many who are *definitely* in the 1 percent, knows right from wrong and understands the devastating consequences of severe income inequality. And "rile up"? Perhaps you mean "voice support for"? "Express outrage on behalf of"?TinyElvis wrote:So Jay is trying to rile up a group that he isn't even a part of? Sounds like a familiar strategy.