Further proof that W is a piece of shit

[Dr. Zapatos]

Sounds serious. I'm sure we all would've been speaking Arabic now if we hadn't gone to war!

oh you mad cause im stylin on you

But you can't style my vehicle!

the cal is on you now

run n tell dat homeboy

<country club laughter>

<old woman morning fart-cough-fart sounds>

<teh slurpy sound in Tiny E's underwear after seeing The Glenn Beck Program>

[Dr. Zapatos]

<what comes after Pimms>

[calexico]

[Lawrence Fan]

Sounds serious. I'm sure we all would've been speaking Arabic now if we hadn't gone to war!

oh you mad cause im stylin on you

But you can't style my vehicle!

the cal is on you now

run n tell dat homeboy

<country club laughter>

<golf claps>

[Lord Filthy Von Blumpkin]

is anyone gonna make a thread about the moveon.org hipsteress/lezbot getting stomped by Rand Paul Tea Partiers?

It's a perfect storm of political season stupidity. On both sides.

[sturgeongeneral]

<pims>

[trousersnakeandlarry]

Sounds serious. I'm sure we all would've been speaking Arabic now if we hadn't gone to war!

oh you mad cause im stylin on you

But you can't style my vehicle!

the cal is on you now

run n tell dat homeboy

<country club laughter>

<old woman morning fart-cough-fart sounds>

[Dr. Zapatos]

Sounds serious. I'm sure we all would've been speaking Arabic now if we hadn't gone to war!

oh you mad cause im stylin on you

But you can't style my vehicle!

the cal is on you now

run n tell dat homeboy

<country club laughter>

[trousersnakeandlarry]

Sounds serious. I'm sure we all would've been speaking Arabic now if we hadn't gone to war!

oh you mad cause im stylin on you

But you can't style my vehicle!

the cal is on you now

run n tell dat homeboy

[Dr. Zapatos]

Sounds serious. I'm sure we all would've been speaking Arabic now if we hadn't gone to war!

oh you mad cause im stylin on you

But you can't style my vehicle!

[ShuckOwens]

i think we have to define WMD.

unWashed Male Derriere

[Tweedy is GOD]

[unchartedthickets]

"By late 2003, even the Bush White House’s staunchest defenders were starting to give up on the idea that there were weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. But for years afterward, WikiLeaks’ newly-released Iraq war documents reveal, U.S. troops continued to find chemical weapons labs, encounter insurgent specialists in toxins, and uncover weapons of mass destruction."

http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2010/10 ... g-results/

it just keeps going doesn't it? i think we have to define WMD. we knew there were WMD's in terms of chemical agents used against the Kurds and Iran. there was a history of usage and possibly left overs from use. were these agents large-scale WMD's and did they have the capacity to inflict large scale damage on US soil? another interest is the use of the term and how it was implied or defined by the acting political body.

here's a wikipedia explanation of the political use:

United States politics

Due to the indiscriminate impact of WMDs, the fear of a WMD attack has shaped political policies and campaigns, fostered social movements, and has been the central theme of many films. Support for different levels of WMD development and control varies nationally and internationally. Yet understanding of the nature of the threats is not high, in part because of imprecise usage of the term by politicians and the media.
Fear of WMD, or of threats diminished by the possession of WMD, has long been used to catalyze public support for various WMD policies. They include mobilization of pro- and anti-WMD campaigners alike, and generation of popular political support. The term WMD may be used as a powerful buzzword,[36] or to generate a culture of fear.[37] It is also used ambiguously, particularly by not distinguishing among the different types of WMD.[38]
A television commercial called Daisy, promoting Democrat Lyndon Johnson's 1964 presidential candidacy, invoked the fear of a nuclear war and was an element in Johnson's subsequent election.
More recently, the threat of potential WMD in Iraq was used by President George W. Bush to generate public support for the 2003 invasion of Iraq.[39][40] Broad reference to Iraqi WMD in general was seen as an element of President Bush's arguments.[38]
As Paul Wolfowitz explained: "For bureaucratic reasons, we settled on one issue, weapons of mass destruction, because it was the one reason everyone could agree on."[41] To date, however, Coalition forces have found mainly degraded artillery shells.
On June 21, 2006, United States Senator Rick Santorum claimed that "We have found weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, chemical weapons." According to the Washington Post, he was referring to 500 such shells "that had been buried near the Iranian border, and then long forgotten, by Iraqi troops during their eight-year war with Iran, which ended in 1988." That night, "intelligence officials reaffirmed that the shells were old and were not the suspected weapons of mass destruction sought in Iraq after the 2003 invasion of Iraq."

[trousersnakeandlarry]

Sounds serious. I'm sure we all would've been speaking Arabic now if we hadn't gone to war!

oh you mad cause im stylin on you

[Dr. Zapatos]

Sounds serious. I'm sure we all would've been speaking Arabic now if we hadn't gone to war!